sustained
H-1B
sustained H-1B Case: Digital Marketing
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because upon de novo review, the AAO found that the petitioner had overcome the basis for the director's denial. The totality of the evidence, including submissions on appeal, established that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation and that the beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Beneficiary Qualifications
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF C-D-, INC. APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: JUNE L 2016 PETITION: FORM 1-129. PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, a digital marketing services firm. seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the H-1B nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 110l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director. Vermont Service Center, denied the petitiOn. The Director concluded that the evidence in the record did not establish that the proffered position qualities as a specialty occupation. The matter is now before us on appeal. In its appeaL the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal. Based upon our review of the entire record of proceedings, including the submissions on appeal addressing the grounds for the Director's decision. we find that the Petitioner has overcome the basis of the Director's denial. Specifically, the totality of evidence now establishes that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. Further, the evidence of record also establishes that the Beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of the proffered position. In visa petition proceedings. it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the immigration benefit sought. Section 291 ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361; Matter ofOtiende, 26 I&N Dec. 127, 128 (BIA 2013). Here, that burden has been met. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. Cite as Matter (~lC-D-. Inc., ID# 17258 (AAO June L 2016)
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.