Sustained
H-1B
H-1B Sustained โ Law (2006): the director's basis for denial was incorrect
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the director's basis for denial was incorrect. The director wrongly applied recruitment requirements for H-1B dependent employers, a status that did not apply to the petitioner, and cited a law that was not in effect at the time of filing. Upon review, the AAO found that the position of foreign law advisor qualified as a specialty occupation and the beneficiary possessed the necessary educational qualifications.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Definition Labor Condition Application (Lca) Requirements H-1B Dependent Employer Status Beneficiary'S Qualifications
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ