sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Market Research

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Market Research

Decision Summary

The director initially denied the petition, concluding the proposed market research analyst position did not qualify as a specialty occupation. The AAO sustained the appeal, finding that although a bachelor's degree is not always the minimum requirement for the occupation, the specific duties for this petitioner were so specialized and complex that the knowledge required is usually associated with a bachelor's degree, thus meeting the criteria.

Criteria Discussed

8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(1) 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(4)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
identifying data deleted to 
prevent clearly unwarranted 
in~rasion of oersonal privacy 
PUBLIC COPY 
U.S. Departmel~t of Homeland Security 
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. A3042 
Washington, DC 20529 
U. S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
FILE: WAC 04 222 53261 Office: CALIFORNIA SERVICE CENTER Date: JUN 1 2 2006 
PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1 101(a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) 
ON BEHALF OF PETFTIONER: 
INSTRUCTIONS: 
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to 
' 
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. 
Robert P. Wiemann, Chief 
Administrative Appeals Office 
WAC 04 222 53261 
Page 2 
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before 
the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be sustained. The petition will be 
approved. 
The petitioner is the owner of six restaurants and seeks to employ the beneficiary as a market research analyst and 
to classify her as a nonimmigrant worker in a specialty occupation pursuant to section 10l(a)(l S)(H)(i)(b) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1 101(a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b). 
The director denied the petition on the basis that the proposed position does not qualify as a specialty occupation. 
On appeal, counsel submits a brief. 
Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. 5 1184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation 
that requires: 
(A) theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized 
knowledge, and 
(B) attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its 
equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States. 
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. 5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A), to qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of 
the following criteria: 
(I) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement 
for entry into the particular position; 
(2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar 
organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is 
so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; 
(3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or 
(4) The nature of the specific duties are so specialized and complex that knowledge required 
to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or 
higher degree. 
Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) interprets the term "degree" in the criteria at 8 C.F.R. 
5 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) to mean not just any bachelor's or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is 
directly related to the proposed position. 
The record of proceeding before the AAO contains: (1) the Form 1-129 and supporting documentation; (2) 
the director's request for additional evidence (RFE); (3) the petitioner's response to the RFE; (4) the 
director's denial letter; and (5) the Form I-290B with counsel's brief. The AAO reviewed the record in its 
entirety before issuing its decision. 
WAC 04 222 53261 
Page 3 
The petitioner seeks the beneficiary's services as a market research analyst. Evidence of the beneficiary's 
duties includes the Form 1-129 petition with attachment and the petitioner's response to the RFE. According 
to this evidence the beneficiary would: 
Collect and analyze data on various demographicaj segments and consumer food 
preferences and buying habits for restaurant suitability; 
Design and analyze research data from surveys on opinions and preferences affecting 
potential success; 
Identify procedures for advertising, pricing, and marketing improvements; 
Forecast and monitor market and industry trends affecting the restaurant business; 
Measure marketing success and assess customer satisfaction; 
Coordinate with marketing executives and professionals in U.S. and in the parent 
company in Japan to collect and review relevant customer data; and 
Finalize and submit reports to management on recommendations through oral and 
visual presentation. 
The petitioner requires a minimum of a bachelor's degree for entry into the proposed position. 
The AAO routinely consults the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook) 
for information about the duties and educational requirements of particular occupations. The duties of the 
proposed position are essentially those of a market research analyst. The Handbook does not, however, 
indicate that a degree in a specific field is required. The petitioner has not, therefore, established that a 
bachelor's or higher degree in a specific specialty, or its equivalent, is normally the minimum requirement for 
entry into the proffered position. 8 C.F.R. $ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(I). 
The petitioner has established, however, that the nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex 
that the knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with the attainment of a bachelor's or 
higher degree. The duties are specialized and complex in nature and are normally performed by individuals 
who have obtained a bachelor's level education, or its equivalent, in such fields as marketing or finance. 
The record establishes that the proposed position includes various market research and analysis functions that 
exceed the scope of a typical market research analyst position. The AAO notes that the beneficiary will work 
as part of a national team and report to the petitioner's director of marketing and site director for development 
and marketing and that this team will give recommendations to an outside advertising consultant who will 
develop and implement an advertising campaign for the petitioner. Taking these factors into consideration, as 
well as the market research and analysis hnctions of the job, the AAO is persuaded that the nature of the 
specific duties of the proposed position is specialized and complex and that the knowledge required to 
perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in marketing or a 
related field. The petitioner has, therefore, satisfied the requirements of 8 C.F.R. $ 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). 
The proposed position is a specialty occupation. 
The director did not comment on the beneficiary's qualifications to perform the duties of the proposed position as 
the petition was denied on another ground. The record is sufficient, however, for the AAO to make that 
determination. The beneficiary holds a bachelor's degree in finance from Portland State University. The 
Handbook does not indicate that a degree need be in a particular field to perform the duties of the proffered 
WAC 04 222 53261 
Page 4 
position. The beneficiary's degree in finance includes coursework that the Handbook indicates is important to 
perform the duties of the occupation. The beneficiary's degree is closely related to the duties of the proposed 
position. As such, the beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of the position as she satisfies the criterion at 
8 C.F.R. 5 2 14.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)(2). 
As always, the burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 
8 U.S.C. 5 1361. The petitioner has sustained that burden and the petition shall accordingly be sustained. 
ORDER: The decision of the director is withdrawn and the appeal is sustained. The petition is approved. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.