sustained H-1B Case: Medicine
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO found that extenuating circumstances excused the beneficiary's failure to complete his three-year employment contract with a previous employer. The prior employer had breached the contract and violated the Labor Condition Application (LCA) by unilaterally reducing the beneficiary's salary, which justified the early termination and allowed the new petition to be approved.
Criteria Discussed
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rrn. A3042
Washington. DC 20529
U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration
Services
FILE: LIN 03 2 17 5 133 8 Office: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER Date: S EP' 1 5 if005
PETITION: Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 10 1 (a)(l 5)(H)(i)(b) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1 10 l(a)(lS)(H)(i)(b)
INSTRUCTIONS:
This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to
the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office.
Robert P. Wiemann, Director
Administrative Appeals Office
LIN 03 217 51338
Page 2
DISCUSSION: The service center director denied the nonimmigrant visa petition and the matter is now before
the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The appeal will be sustained. The petition will be
approved.
The petitioner is a non-profit hospital that seeks to employ the beneficiary as a physician. The director denied the
petition finding that the record did not establish that extenuating circumstances prevented the beneficiary fiom
completing his obligated three-year period of employment with a previous petitioner.
On appeal, counsel submits a brief and additional information stating that the Form 1-129 petition should be
approved.
Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. ยง 212.7(~)(9), aliens admitted to the United States under section 101(a)(15)(J) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), or who acquired status under section lOl(a)(15)(J) of the Act after
admission to the United States, to participate in an exchange program of graduate medical education or training,
may be granted a waiver of the 2-year home country residence and physical presence requirement (the 2-year
requirement) under section 212(e)(iii) of the Act. Foreign medical graduates are eligible to apply for a waiver of
the 2-year residency requirement based on a request by a State Department of Public Health if they meet the
following conditions:
(A) They were admitted to the United States under section 101(a)(15)(J) of the Act, or acquired
nonimmigrant J nonimmigrant status before June 1,2002, to pursue graduate medical education or
training in the United States;
(B) They have entered into a bona fide, full-time employment contract for 3 years to practice medicine at
a health care facility located in an area or areas designated by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services as having a shortage of healthcare professionals ("HHS-designated shortage area");
(C) They agree to commence employment within 90 days of receipt of the waiver under this section and
agree to practice medicine for 3 years at the facility named in the waiver application and only in
HHS-designated shortage areas. . . .
8 C.F.R. 8 212.7(c)(d)(iv) provides that foreign medical graduates who fail to meet the terms and conditions
imposed on the waiver under section 214(1) of the Act and this paragraph will once again become subject to the
2-year requirement under section 212(e) of the Act. Under section 214(1)(B) of the Act, however, the Service
(now Citizenship and Immigration Services - CIS) may, in the exercise of discretion, excuse early termination of
the foreign medical graduates 3-year period of employment with the health care facility named in the waiver
application due to extenuating circumstances. Such circumstances may include, but are not limited to, closure of
the health care facility or hardship to the alien. A determination of whether to excuse such early termination of
employment shall be based on the specific facts of each case, with the foreign medical graduate bearing the
burden of establishing eligibility for a favorable exercise of discretion. Under no circumstance, however, will a
foreign medical graduate be able to apply for a change of status to another nonimmigrant category, for an
immigrant visa, or for status as a lawful permanent resident prior to completing the requisite 3-year period of
employment for a healthcare facility located in an HHS-designated shortage area.
Under 8 C.F.R. 5 212.7(c)(d)(v) a foreign medical graduate who seeks to have early termination of employment
excused due to extenuating circumstances shall submit documentary evidence establishing such a claim. The
graduate shall, in all cases, submit an employment contract with another healthcare facility located in an HHS-
designated shortage area for the balance of the required 3-year period of employment. A graduate claiming
LIN 03 217 51338
Page 3
extenuating circumstances based on hardship shall submit evidence that the hardship was caused by unforeseen
circumstances beyond his or her control.
In this instance, the director determined that the petitioner's employment was terminated for reasons that did not
merit the exercise of discretion by CIS excusing early termination. The director, therefore, denied the Form 1-129
petition.
On appeal, counsel states, in part, and the record establishes, that the initial employer, Warrensburg Medical
Clinic, violated the terms of the ETA 9035 Labor Condition Application (LCA), and breached its contract with
the beneficiary, by decreasing the beneficiary's annual salary from $125,930, to approximately $100,600, or
approximately 80 per cent of the contractual wage agreed upon. This reduction in salary is reflected in the record
by copies of the beneficiary's paychecks while in the employ of the Warrensburg Medical Clinic. The record
further establishes that the former employer required the beneficiary to perform services at a location other than
that designated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's June 19, 2002 grant of the beneficiary's waiver of the
two-year-foreign residence re uirement. There is also evidence of record in the form of a new employment
contract signed by& behalf of the Warrensburgh Medical Clinic, on May 8,2003, attempting
to renegotiate the terms of the beneficiary's employment and further cut his salary to $6,000 per month, or
approximately 54 per cent of the prevailing wage rate for the position as indicated on the original LCA certified
on July 1, 2002. The beneficiary refused to sign that contract. Counsel asserts that this unilateral reduction in
salary alone constitutes extreme hardship to the beneficiary, was beyond his control, and constitutes extenuating
circumstances that prevented the beneficiary from completing his obligated 3-year period of employment.
The record further reflects that CIS approved the beneficiary's application to waive the foreign residence
requirement on July 3, 2002. CIS subsequently approved the Form 1-129 petition and the beneficiary was
admitted into the United States on August 20, 2002 in valid H-1B status. The beneficiary's employment was
authorized from July 15, 2002 until July 1, 2005, and he began his employment with the Warrensburg Medical
Clinic on September 1, 2002, leaving that employment on May 13, 2003 after he was terminated for refusal to
alter the terms of his initial employment contract.
On July 9,2003, the present petitioner, Texas County Memorial Hospital, filed a Form 1-129 petition on behalf of
the beneficiary. The petitioner seeks the beneficiary's employment from July 9,2003 until June 15,2006, and an
employment contract has been filed of record indicating that the beneficiary would be employed for at least the
remainder of his 3-year term of employment authorized by the aforementioned waiver requirements in a
medically underserved area.
The record establishes that the petitioner, Warrensburgh Medical Clinic's, unilateral reduction in salary of the
beneficiary to a rate 20 per cent below that authorized on the LCA, and subsequent termination from employment
establishes that extenuating circumstances prevented the beneficiary from completing his three year term of
employment with that petitioner. As such, Texas County Memorial Hospital, a medical facility operating in a
medically underserved area in the State of Missouri, is entitled to employ the beneficiary in the capacity
petitioned.
The AAO further notes that the former employer's relocation of the beneficiary to a non-approved site would
have placed the beneficiary in non-compliance with the terms and conditions of his U.S. Department of
Agriculture waiver of the foreign residency requirement.
LIN 03 217 51338
Page 4
The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C.
9 136 1. The petitioner has sustained that burden and the appeal shall accordingly be sustained.
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. The petition is approved. Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.