Sustained
H-1B
H-1B Sustained โ Software Development (2003): the AAO determined that the six-year maximum period of
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the six-year maximum period of authorized stay for an H-1B nonimmigrant only accrues during periods when the alien is physically present in the United States. The director incorrectly denied the petition, arguing that time spent abroad on a work assignment was not interruptive of employment. The AAO ruled that any time spent outside the U.S. can be 'recaptured,' and since the petitioner provided proof of the beneficiary's 30-day absence, the extension was granted.
Criteria Discussed
Maximum Period Of Stay Recapturing Time Spent Abroad
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more H-1B decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ