sustained H-1B Case: Software Development

Non-Precedent Decision of the
Administrative Appeals Office 
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 34070652 Date: SEP. 27, 2024 
Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) 
The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the H-IB nonirnrnigrant 
classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 
10l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. § 110l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) . The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to 
file a petition with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to temporarily employ a 
qualified nonimmigrant worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical 
application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher 
degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. 
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not 
establish that the Beneficiary is qualified for the proffered position under any of the regulatory criteria 
at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C). The matter is now before us on appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3. 
The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence. 
Matter ofChawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010). We review the questions in this matter 
de novo. Matter of Christa's, Inc., 26 I&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de novo review, 
we will sustain the appeal. 
Section 10l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) of the Act defines an H-lB nonimmigrant as a foreign national "who is 
corning temporarily to the United States to perform services ... in a specialty occupation described in 
section 214(i)(l) . . . . " Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § l 184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty 
occupation" as an occupation that requires the "theoretical and practical application of a body of highly 
specialized knowledge, and attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its 
equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States." The regulation at 
8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(ii) largely restates section 214(i)(l) of the Act, but adds a non-exhaustive list 
of fields of endeavor. 
In addition, 8 C.F.R. § 2 l 4.2(h)( 4)(iii)(A) provides that the proffered position must meet one of four 
criteria to qualify as a specialty occupation position. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) must be read with 
the statutory and regulatory definitions of a specialty occupation under section 214(i)(l) of the Act 
and 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(ii). We construe the term "degree" to mean not just any baccalaureate or 
higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is directly related to the proposed position. See Royal 
Siam Corp. v. Chertoff, 484 F.3d 139, 147 (1st Cir. 2007) (describing "a degree requirement in a 
specific specialty" as "one that relates directly to the duties and responsibilities of a particular 
position"). Lastly, 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(i)(A)(I) states that an H-lB classification may be granted 
to a foreign national who "will perform services in a specialty occupation ... " ( emphasis added). 
Long standing legal standards require that the Director first determine whether the proffered position 
qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation and then move to determine whether the 
beneficiary was qualified for the position at the time the nonimmigrant petition was filed. Cf Matter 
of Michael Hertz Assocs., 19 I&N Dec. 588, 560 (Comm'r 1988). The regulations at 8 C.F.R. 
§ 214.2(h)( 4)(iii)(C) require that a beneficiary meet one of four criteria to qualify to perform services 
in a specialty occupation: 
(1) Hold a United States bachelor's degree or higher required by the specialty 
occupation from an accredited college or university; 
(2) Hold a foreign degree determined to be equivalent to a United States bachelor's 
degree or higher required by the specialty occupation from an accredited college 
or university; 
(3) Hold an unrestricted State license, registration, or certification which authorizes 
him or her to fully practice the specialty occupation and be immediately engaged 
in that specialty in the state of intended employment; or 
(4) Have education, specialized training, and/ or progressively responsible 
experience that is equivalent to completion of a United States bachelor's degree 
or higher in the specialty occupation, and have recognition of expertise in the 
specialty through progressively responsible positions directly related to the 
specialty. 
The Director's decision does not state a finding as to whether the proffered position is a specialty 
occupation, but upon de novo review we conclude that it is. The Petitioner seeks to employ the 
Beneficiary in the position of "Software Development Engineer III." On the labor condition 
application (LCA) submitted in support of the petition, the Petitioner stated that the proffered position 
is in the occupational category of "Software Developers" with Standard Occupational Classification 
(SOC) code 15-1252. The Petitioner stated that its educational requirement for the position is a 
bachelor's degree or higher or its equivalent in computer science, computer or electronics engineering, 
information technology, or a related field. The Petitioner's degree requirement is consistent with the 
U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook) profile for the occupation 
"Software Developers, Quality Assurance Analysts, and Testers," which states that the occupation 
typically requires a bachelor's degree in "computer and information technology or a related field such 
as engineering or mathematics." See Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Dep't of Labor, Occupational 
Outlook Handbook, Software Developers, Quality Assurance Analysts, and Testers (August 29, 2024), 
https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/software-developers.htm. The job 
duties for the proffered position further support the Petitioner's educational requirement, as they 
primarily relate to the development and deployment of multi-tiered, embedded and/or distributed 
software tools, systems, and services; driving all phases of the full development cycle; and gathering, 
2 
defining, and translating technical and functional requirements into robust, efficient, and supportable 
solutions that work within system architecture. We therefore conclude that the Petitioner has shown 
that the job duties for the proffered position, viewed in context with the Handbook's guidance and the 
scale and complexity of the Petitioner's business operations, demonstrate that the position requires the 
theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and the attainment of 
a bachelor's degree or higher in the specific specialty or its equivalent. Moreover, we specifically 
conclude that the record establishes that the nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex 
that the knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a 
baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific specialty. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). 
We tum next to the Beneficiary's qualification for the specialty occupation, which was the basis for 
the Director's denial. The Beneficiary possesses a bachelor of technology degree from the 
India. The record contains an evaluation 
of the Beneficiary's education which concludes that the Beneficiary's bachelor of technology degree 
is comparable to a U.S. bachelor of science degree in electronics engineering. Further, according to 
the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO) Electronic 
Database for Global Education (EDGE), 1 a bachelor of technology degree such as the Beneficiary's 
represents the attainment of a level of education comparable to a bachelor's degree in the United 
States. We therefore conclude that the Beneficiary's bachelor of technology degree is equivalent to a 
U.S. bachelor of science degree in electronics engineering. 
Therefore, the record establishes that the Beneficiary is qualified to perform services in the specialty 
occupation. The record demonstrates that the Petitioner will accept a bachelor's degree or higher in 
computer science, computer or electronics engineering, information technology, or a related field. 
Because the Beneficiary possesses a foreign degree determined to be equivalent to a U. S. bachelor's 
degree in electronics engineering, the Beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of this specialty 
occupation under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)(2). 
The evidence of record establishes that the proffered position requires both the theoretical and practical 
application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and the attainment of a bachelor's degree or 
higher in the specific specialty or its equivalent. Moreover, the record establishes that the Beneficiary 
was qualified for the occupation at the time the petition was filed. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 
1 We consider EDGE to be a reliable source of information about foreign credential equivalencies. See Confluence Intern., 
Inc. v. Holder, Civil No. 08-2665 (DSD-JJG), 2009 WL 825793 (D. Minn. Mar. 27, 2009); Tisco Group, Inc. v. Napolitano, 
No. 09-cv-10072, 2010 WL 3464314 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 30, 2010); Sunshine Rehab Services, Inc. No. 09-13605, 2010 WL 
3325442 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 20, 2010). See also Viraj, LLC v. Holder, No. 2:12-CV-00127-RWS, 2013 WL 1943431 (N.D. 
Ga. May 18, 2013). 
3