sustained
H-1B
sustained H-1B Case: Software Engineering
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO first determined that the proffered position of Staff Software Engineer qualified as a specialty occupation. The AAO then found that the beneficiary was qualified for the role, concluding that their foreign bachelor's degree in electronics and communication engineering was equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree in a required field.
Criteria Discussed
8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(C) 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A) 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(C)(2)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: OCT. 24, 2024 In Re: 34070480 Appeal of Texas Service Center Decision Form 1-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the H-IB nonirnrnigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 10l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. § 110l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) . The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to file a petition with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to temporarily employ a qualified nonimmigrant worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the Beneficiary is qualified for the proffered position under any of the regulatory criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C). The matter is now before us on appeal pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3. The Petitioner bears the burden of proof to demonstrate eligibility by a preponderance of the evidence. Matter ofChawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 375-76 (AAO 2010). We review the questions in this matter de novo. Matter of Christa's, Inc., 26 I&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal. Section 10l(a)(l5)(H)(i)(b) of the Act defines an H-lB nonimmigrant as a foreign national "who is corning temporarily to the United States to perform services ... in a specialty occupation described in section 214(i)(l) . . . . " Section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § l 184(i)(l), defines the term "specialty occupation" as an occupation that requires the "theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum for entry into the occupation in the United States." The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(ii) largely restates section 214(i)(l) of the Act but adds a non-exhaustive list of fields of endeavor. In addition, 8 C.F.R. § 2 l 4.2(h)( 4)(iii)(A) provides that the proffered position must meet one of four criteria to qualify as a specialty occupation position. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A) must be read with the statutory and regulatory definitions of a specialty occupation under section 214(i)(l) of the Act and 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(ii). We construe the term "degree" to mean not just any baccalaureate or higher degree, but one in a specific specialty that is directly related to the proposed position. See Royal Siam Corp. v. Chertoff, 484 F.3d 139, 147 (1st Cir. 2007) (describing "a degree requirement in a specific specialty" as "one that relates directly to the duties and responsibilities of a particular position"). Lastly, 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(i)(A)(I) states that an H-lB classification may be granted to a foreign national who "will perform services in a specialty occupation ... " ( emphasis added). Long standing legal standards require that the Director first determine whether the proffered position qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation and then move to determine whether the beneficiary was qualified for the position at the time the nonimmigrant petition was filed. Cf Matter of Michael Hertz Assocs., 19 I&N Dec. 588, 560 (Comm'r 1988). The regulations at 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)( 4)(iii)(C) require that a beneficiary meet one of four criteria to qualify to perform services in a specialty occupation: (1) Hold a United States bachelor's degree or higher required by the specialty occupation from an accredited college or university; (2) Hold a foreign degree determined to be equivalent to a United States bachelor's degree or higher required by the specialty occupation from an accredited college or university; (3) Hold an unrestricted State license, registration, or certification which authorizes him or her to fully practice the specialty occupation and be immediately engaged in that specialty in the state of intended employment; or (4) Have education, specialized training, and/ or progressively responsible experience that is equivalent to completion of a United States bachelor's degree or higher in the specialty occupation, and have recognition of expertise in the specialty through progressively responsible positions directly related to the specialty. The Petitioner seeks to employ the Beneficiary in the position of "Staff Software Engineer." On the labor condition application (LCA) submitted in support of the petition, the Petitioner stated that the proffered position is in the occupational category of "Software Developers" with Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code 15-1252. The Petitioner stated that its educational requirement for the position is a bachelor's degree or higher or its equivalent in computer science, electronic engineering, or a related field. The Petitioner's degree requirement is consistent with the U.S. Department of Labor's Occupational Outlook Handbook (Handbook) profile for the occupation "Software Developers, Quality Assurance Analysts, and Testers," which states that the occupation typically requires a bachelor's degree in "computer and information technology or a related field such as engineering or mathematics." See Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Dep't of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, Software Developers, Quality Assurance Analysts, and Testers (October 24, 2024), https ://www. b ls. gov/ ooh/ computer-and-information-technology/ software-developers.htm. The job duties for the proffered position further support the Petitioner's educational requirement, as they primarily relate to the development, analysis, requirement gathering, designing and coding, and testing of user requirement phasing. We therefore conclude that the Petitioner has shown that the job duties for the proffered position, viewed in context with the Handbook's guidance and the scale and complexity of the Petitioner's business operations, demonstrate that the position requires the 2 theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and the attainment of a bachelor's degree or higher in the specific specialty or its equivalent. Moreover, we specifically conclude that the record establishes that the nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree in a specific specialty. 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). We tum next to the Beneficiary's qualification for the specialty occupation, which was the basis for the Director's denial. The Beneficiary possesses a bachelor's degree in electronics and communication engineering from India. The record contains an evaluation of the Beneficiary's education which concludes that the Beneficiary's bachelor of technology degree is comparable to a U.S. bachelor of science degree in electronics engineering. We therefore conclude that the Beneficiary's bachelor of technology degree is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor of science degree in electronics engineering. Therefore, the record establishes that the Beneficiary is qualified to perform services in the specialty occupation. The record demonstrates that the Petitioner will accept a bachelor's degree or higher in computer science, electronic engineering, or a related field. Because the Beneficiary possesses a foreign degree determined to be equivalent to a U. S. bachelor's degree in electronics engineering, the Beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of this specialty occupation under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(C)(2). The evidence of record establishes that the proffered position requires both the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and the attainment of a bachelor's degree or higher in the specific specialty or its equivalent. Moreover, the record establishes that the Beneficiary was qualified for the occupation at the time the petition was filed. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 3
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.