sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Software Engineering

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Software Engineering

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the AAO determined that the totality of the evidence established the proffered position qualified as a specialty occupation. The AAO found that the specific duties of the software engineer role were so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with the attainment of at least a bachelor's degree in a specific field.

Criteria Discussed

Specialty Occupation 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(4)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 9920136 
Appeal of Vermont Service Center Decision 
Form 1-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-lB) 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date : WL Y 29, 2020 
The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as a "software engineer" under the H-IB 
nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) 
section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). 
The Vermont Service Center Director denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner had not 
established that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. On appeal, the Petitioner submits 
additional documentation and contends that the petition should be approved. In these proceedings, it 
is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the requested benefit by a preponderance of the 
evidence .1 We review the questions in this matter de novo.2 Upon de nova review, we will sustain 
the appeal. 
The totality of the evidence establishes that the nature of the proffered position's specific duties is so 
specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with the 
attainment of at least a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty. Our evaluation of the overall weight 
of the evidentiary record leads us to conclude that this case favors sustaining the appeal under the 
criterion found at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). Further, the Petitioner has established that the 
proffered position otherwise qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation as that term is defined 
by section 214(i)(l) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1184(i)(l), and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii). Additionally, 
the record establishes that the Beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of the proffered position. 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained . 
1 Section 291 of the Act; Matter ofChawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 375 (AAO 2010). 
2 See Matter of Christo 's Inc ., 26 l&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015) . 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.