sustained H-1B

sustained H-1B Case: Specialty Occupation

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Specialty Occupation

Decision Summary

The appeal was sustained because the petitioner overcame the director's denial by establishing the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. The petitioner provided a detailed job description and explained the complex nature of the project, demonstrating that the duties are so specialized and complex that they require knowledge equivalent to a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty.

Criteria Discussed

8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(4) Specialty Occupation Definition

Sign up free to download the original PDF

View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship 
and Immigration 
Services 
In Re: 8995894 
Appeal of California Service Center Decision 
Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-1B) 
Non-Precedent Decision of the 
Administrative Appeals Office 
Date: JULY 28, 2020 
The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for 
specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. 
ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). 
The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish 
that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. Upon de nova review, we will sustain the 
appeal. 
Based upon our review of the entire record of proceedings, we find that the Petitioner has overcome the basis 
of the Director's denial and conclude that the record establishes that the nature of the specific duties is so 
specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with the 
attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in a specific specialty, or its equivalent. Specifically, the 
Petitioner has provided a detailed job description for the proffered position and explained the type of 
complex project the Beneficiary will work on in the proffered position. Therefore, the record satisfies 
the criterion at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). Further, the Petitioner has established that the 
proffered position qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation as defined by section 214(i)( 1) 
of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1184(i)(l), and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii). 
ORDER: The appeal is sustained. 
Using this case in a petition? Let MeritDraft draft the argument →

Use this winning precedent in your petition

MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.

Build Your Winning Petition →

No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.