sustained
H-1B
sustained H-1B Case: Specialty Occupation
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner overcame the director's denial by establishing the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. The petitioner provided a detailed job description and explained the complex nature of the project, demonstrating that the duties are so specialized and complex that they require knowledge equivalent to a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty.
Criteria Discussed
8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(H)(4)(Iii)(A)(4) Specialty Occupation Definition
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 8995894 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-1B) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date: JULY 28, 2020 The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the H-lB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation. Upon de nova review, we will sustain the appeal. Based upon our review of the entire record of proceedings, we find that the Petitioner has overcome the basis of the Director's denial and conclude that the record establishes that the nature of the specific duties is so specialized and complex that the knowledge required to perform them is usually associated with the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in a specific specialty, or its equivalent. Specifically, the Petitioner has provided a detailed job description for the proffered position and explained the type of complex project the Beneficiary will work on in the proffered position. Therefore, the record satisfies the criterion at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(4). Further, the Petitioner has established that the proffered position qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation as defined by section 214(i)( 1) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1184(i)(l), and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii). ORDER: The appeal is sustained.
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.