sustained
H-1B
sustained H-1B Case: Strategic Consulting
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the petitioner submitted additional evidence establishing that it normally requires a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty, or its equivalent, for the proffered position. This new evidence satisfied the regulatory criteria for a specialty occupation, overturning the director's initial denial.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Employer Normally Requires Degree
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
MATTER OF K-A-, INC. APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: SEPT. 26,2016 PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, a strategic consulting firm, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as an "analyst" under the H -1 B nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The Hยญ lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position. The Director, Vermont Service Center, denied the petition. The Director concluded that the Petitioner had not demonstrated that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation position. The matter is now before us on appeal. In its appeal, the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal. Specifically, the totality of evidence now establishes that the Petitioner normally requires a bachelor's degree in a specific specialty, or its equivalent, for the position. Therefore, we conclude that the evidence of record satisfies the criterion at 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A)(3). Further, the Petitioner has also established that the proffered position otherwise qualifies for classification as a specialty occupation as defined by section 214(i)(l) of the Act and 8 C.F.R. ยง 214.2(h)(4)(ii). In visa petition proceedings, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the immigration benefit sought. Section 291 ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361; Matter ofOtiende, 26 I&N Dec. 127, 128 (BIA 2013). Here, that burden has been met. ORDER: The appeal is sustained. Cite as Matter of K-A -, Inc., ID# 124904 (AAO Sept. 26, 20 16)
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.