sustained
H-1B
sustained H-1B Case: Unknown
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the AAO, upon de novo review, found that the petitioner had overcome the basis for the denial. The record established that the proffered position is a specialty occupation and that the beneficiary is qualified, as their foreign degree was shown to be equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree directly related to the position.
Criteria Discussed
Specialty Occupation Beneficiary Qualifications Foreign Degree Equivalency
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services In Re: 6758113 Appeal of California Service Center Decision Form I-129, Petition for Nonimmigrant Worker (H-IB) Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office Date : JAN. 8, 2020 The Petitioner seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary under the H-IB nonimmigrant classification for specialty occupations. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), 8 U.S.C. ยง 110l(a)(15)(H)(i)(b). The H-lB program allows a U.S. employer to temporarily employ a qualified foreign worker in a position that requires both: (a) the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge; and (b) the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty (or its equivalent) as a minimum prerequisite for entry into the position . The Director of the California Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary is qualified for the proffered position, and dismissed a subsequently filed motion to reopen and motion to reconsider. In these proceedings, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the requested benefit. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. ยง 1361. Upon de nova review, we will sustain the appeal. Based upon our review of the entire record of proceedings , we find that the Petitioner has overcome the basis of the Director's denials. In this matter, the record demonstrates that the proffered position is a specialty occupation. Our review of the Beneficiary's academic credentials , the opinions regarding the duties, the requirements necessary to perform those duties, and the documents submitted on appeal establishes that the Beneficiary is qualified to perform the duties of the proffered position. The Petitioner has established that the Beneficiary's foreign degree is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree, and that it shares sufficient commonality with the degrees required to perform the proffered position. The totality of the record establishes, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the Petitioner's particular position requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and the attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty ( or its equivalent) as a minimum for entering into the occupation in the United States. And further, that the Beneficiary's degree is directly related to the proffered position. The Beneficiary is academically qualified to perform the duties of the specialty occupation. ORDER: The appeal is sustained .
Use this winning precedent in your petition
MeritDraft analyzes sustained AAO decisions like this one to generate petition arguments that mirror what actually gets approved.
Build Your Winning Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.