L-1A Dismissed — Business Investment (2019): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in an

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary would be employed in an executive capacity. At the time of filing, the petitioner's primary business, a car care franchise, was not yet operational and had no mechanics. The petitioner's other investment ventures were also not operational or the petitioner lacked a controlling interest, failing to show the company was engaged in the regular, systematic, and continuous provision of goods or services.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF