L-1A Dismissed — Clothing Distribution (2005): did not meet a specific error of law or fact in the

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify a specific error of law or fact in the original decision. Instead, the petitioner presented new evidence of business expansion that occurred after the petition was filed, which cannot be used to establish eligibility retroactively as eligibility must exist at the time of filing.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF