L-1A Dismissed — Computer Services / Construction (2005): did not establish a brief or additional evidence to

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to submit a brief or additional evidence to challenge the director's findings, as promised on the appeal form. The petitioner did not specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact made by the director. The AAO also noted other deficiencies, including insufficient evidence of a qualifying corporate relationship and a lack of proof that the petitioner had been 'doing business' for the required one-year period.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF