L-1A Dismissed — Construction (2017): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. The Director and the AAO found that the beneficiary's claimed executive duties, such as strategic marketing and sales, were inconsistent with the company's limited scope of operations, which consisted of a single residential property awaiting permits for demolition and construction.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF