L-1A Dismissed — Construction (2023): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed primarily in an executive capacity, as opposed to performing day-to-day operational tasks. The petitioner's description of duties was vague and evidence suggested the beneficiary was performing non-qualifying tasks such as acquiring properties and arranging inspections, without sufficient proof that executive duties would predominate.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF