L-1A Dismissed — Cosmetics (2017): the appeal was summarily dismissed primarily because the

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed primarily because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the original decision, as required. Additionally, the AAO found the evidence insufficient to establish that the beneficiary had completed the required one continuous year of full-time employment abroad, noting that he was a student in Canada and a visitor in the U.S. for most of the claimed employment period.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF