L-1A Dismissed — Dental Products (2005): did not meet any specific erroneous conclusion of law or

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. Instead, the petitioner blamed their former counsel for submitting an inaccurate job description and impermissibly attempted to submit a new, inconsistent one on appeal.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF