L-1A Dismissed — Fruit Drink Distribution (2005): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision. Despite promising to submit a brief and evidence, counsel failed to do so for nearly a year, and the evidence ultimately submitted pertained to a different case entirely.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF