L-1A Dismissed — Hair Care Products (2006): did not establish a brief or new evidence after filing the

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to provide a brief or new evidence after filing the appeal. The AAO agreed with the director's finding that the record did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity, as the job description was vague and there was insufficient evidence of subordinate staff to perform the company's day-to-day operational tasks.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF