L-1A Dismissed — Hotel Business (2005): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. The petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to overcome the director's findings, which included the failure to establish that the beneficiary had one continuous year of employment abroad in a managerial capacity, that a qualifying corporate relationship existed, that sufficient physical premises for a new office had been secured, and that the proposed U.S. position was managerial or executive.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF