L-1A Dismissed — Import/Export (2006): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision. The petitioner did not submit new evidence, instead relying on previous arguments that the director had already found insufficient to prove the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial/executive capacity or that a qualifying relationship existed.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF