L-1A Dismissed — International Trade (2007): did not meet any specific erroneous conclusion of law or

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. The AAO also noted on the merits that the petitioner failed to establish the beneficiary had the required one year of qualifying employment abroad, as the evidence indicated he was an independent contractor rather than an employee of the foreign entity.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF