L-1A Dismissed — International Trade And Consulting (2005): did not establish the beneficiary has been or will be

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary has been or will be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. The AAO found that the petitioner's descriptions of the beneficiary's U.S. and foreign duties were vague, nonspecific, and failed to detail what the beneficiary does on a day-to-day basis, making it impossible to determine if the duties were primarily qualifying.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF