dismissed
L-1A
dismissed L-1A Case: Leather Goods
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the Petitioner failed to meet procedural requirements. The Petitioner stated it would submit a brief or additional evidence but did not, thereby failing to identify a specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision.
Criteria Discussed
Failure To Identify Erroneous Conclusion Of Law Or Statement Of Fact
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
) 1 ·• U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services MATTER OF 0-T-INC. APPEAL OF VERMONT SERVICE CENTER DECISION Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Ollice DATE: JUNE 22,2018 PETITION: FORM 1-129, PETITION FOR A NONIMMIGRANT WORKER The Petitioner, a leather goods importer, seeks to temporarily employ the Beneficiary as the "president and chief executive manager" of its new office under the L-lA nonimmigrant classification for intracompany transferees. .Immigration and Nationality Act section 101(a)(15)(L), 8 U.S.C. § l10J(a)(15)(L). The L-IA classification allows a corporation or other legal entity (including its affiliate or subsidiary) to transfer a qualifying foreign employee to the United States to work temporarily in a managerial or executive capacity. The Director of the Vermont Service Center denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal. An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(l)(v). The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. On the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, the Petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of the January 9, 2018, filing date. However, we have not received anything further from the Petitioner to date. Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). . Cite as Malter ofO-T-Jnc., ID# 1553077 (AAO June 22, 2018)
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.