L-1A Dismissed — Logistics (2006): the petitioner failed to specifically identify any

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision, as required by regulations. Additionally, the AAO declined to review new evidence submitted on appeal, noting that it should have been submitted in response to the director's prior Request for Evidence.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF