L-1A Dismissed — Marketing (2005): the petitioner and counsel failed to specifically identify

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner and counsel failed to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. The AAO also noted that the petitioner tried to submit a materially different description of the beneficiary's duties on appeal, which is not permissible as eligibility must be established at the time of the initial filing.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF