L-1A Dismissed — Photographic Products (2005): the counsel failed to specifically identify an erroneous

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the counsel failed to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision, as required by regulations. The petitioner did not overcome the director's finding that the beneficiary would be primarily performing routine operational duties rather than functioning in a true managerial or executive capacity.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF