L-1A Dismissed — Property Management (2004): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in the

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in the United States in a primarily managerial or executive capacity. The director concluded, and the AAO agreed, that the evidence was insufficient to show the beneficiary's duties were not primarily performing the day-to-day services of the property management business, despite her title.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF