L-1A Dismissed — Property Management (2003): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed primarily in a managerial or executive capacity. The director found the description of duties was insufficient to demonstrate that the beneficiary would primarily perform qualifying tasks, as opposed to the day-to-day operational tasks of the business. The petitioner's claims regarding the beneficiary's supervisory role and management of an essential function were not substantiated by the evidence provided.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF