L-1A Dismissed — Property Management And Product Distribution (2020): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily executive capacity. The provided job description was found to be vague, repetitive, and focused on broad policy-making authority without detailing the beneficiary's specific day-to-day duties. The AAO concluded that the petitioner did not provide an adequate explanation of the beneficiary's activities, which is necessary to prove the true nature of the employment is executive rather than operational.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF