Dismissed
L-1A
L-1A Dismissed โ Real Estate (2023): did not establish the beneficiary was primarily managing an
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary was primarily managing an essential function by the time the extension petition was filed. The AAO rejected the argument for deference to the prior 'new office' approval, clarifying that the eligibility requirements for an initial petition (supporting a managerial role within one year) are different and less stringent than for an extension (proving the role is currently managerial).
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Capacity Function Manager Personnel Manager New Office Extension Deference To Prior Approval
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ