L-1A Dismissed — Real Estate Investment (2023): did not establish the beneficiary was employed abroad

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary was employed abroad primarily in an executive capacity. The job descriptions provided were vague, merely restating statutory definitions without detailing specific day-to-day tasks. Furthermore, the evidence suggested the beneficiary performed non-executive duties, such as preparing financial documents, and the petitioner did not provide requested details about subordinate employees to clarify the beneficiary's role.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF