L-1A Dismissed — Restaurant (2005): the petitioner failed to specifically identify an error of

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify an error of law or fact in the director's initial denial. The director found that the petitioner did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity, nor that the U.S. entity had been doing business for one year at the time of filing. The petitioner's appeal only discussed the company's current situation and did not address these key deficiencies from the time of filing.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF