dismissed
L-1A
dismissed L-1A Case: Restaurant/Hospitality
Decision Summary
The appeal was dismissed as moot. The beneficiary had already adjusted status to that of a permanent resident as of April 2, 2004, through a separate petition with the same employer, rendering the issues in this nonimmigrant proceeding irrelevant.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Capacity Mootness
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →View Full Decision Text
U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Massachusetts Ave , N W , Rm. A3042 Washington, DC 20529 U. S. Citizenship and Immigration Services File: EAC 02 159 53748 Office: VERMONT SERVICE CENTER Date: Petition: Petition for a Nonirnmigrant Worker Pursuant to Section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 8 1101(a)(15)(L) IN BEHALF OF PETITIONER: INSTRUCTIONS: This is the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office in your case. All documents have been returned to the office that originally decided your case. Any further inquiry must be made to that office. - a Robert P. Wiemann, Director Administrative Appeals Office EAC 02 159 53748 Page 2 DISCUSSION: The Director, Vermont Service Center, denied the petition for a nonimrnigrant visa. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The AAO will dismiss the appeal. The petitioner filed this nonirnmigrant petition seeking to employ the beneficiary as an L-1A nonimmigrant intracompany transferee pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(L) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. 5 1101(a)(15)(L). The petitioner is a corporation organized in the State of New Jersey that claims to operate a restaurant, a catering business and a health clublspa. The petitioner's 2001 IRS Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return identifies it as a holding company with three subsidiaries. The petitioner claims that it is the affiliate of located in~he petitioner seeks to employ the beneficiary as its ac~ountin~lfinancial manager. The director denied the petition concluding that the beneficiary would not be employed in a primarily executive or managerial capacity. The petitioner subsequently filed an appeal. The director declined to treat the appeal as a motion and forwarded the appeal to the AAO for review. On appeal, counsel for the petitioner explains that the petitioner filed the instant petition for the sole purpose of seeking an amended Form 1-797 Approval Notice for a previously approved petition filed by the petitioner on behalf of the beneficiary for the same position. Counsel claims that the director erroneously issued a denial, "ignoring the fact that this petition has already been approved and continuing to ignore and disregard the beneficiary's request for a change of status." Counsel requests that the decision be withdrawn and a proper Form I-797A Approval Notice be issued. A review of the Citizenship and Immigration Services (CIS) records indicates that this beneficiary in this case is also the beneficiary of an approved immigrant petition, filed by the same employer, and has adjusted status to that of a permanent resident as of April 2, 2004. While the petitioner has not withdrawn the appeal in this proceeding, it would appear that the beneficiary is presently a permanent resident and the issues in this proceeding are moot. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. ORDER: The appeal is dismissed as moot.
Avoid the mistakes that led to this denial
MeritDraft learns from dismissed cases so your petition avoids the same pitfalls. Get arguments built on winning precedents.
Avoid This in My Petition →No credit card required. Generate your first petition draft in minutes.