L-1A Dismissed — Restaurant/Property Management (2017): the petitioner failed to specifically identify an erroneous

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original decision, as required. The AAO also noted that even if the appeal were considered on its merits, the new evidence did not resolve deficiencies regarding the beneficiary's foreign employment capacity or the new office's ability to support a manager, citing conflicting job descriptions and questionable financial documentation.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF