L-1A Dismissed — Retail (2005): the petitioner failed to specifically identify an erroneous

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original denial, as required by regulation. The AAO noted that the petitioner's counsel merely repeated information already in the record and improperly introduced new facts that arose after the petition was filed.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF