L-1A Dismissed — Retail (2005): the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusions of law or statements of fact in the original decision as required by regulation. The director had initially denied the petition because the petitioner failed to provide a detailed description of the beneficiary's job duties to establish employment in a managerial or executive capacity, and the appeal did not sufficiently rebut this finding.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF