L-1A Dismissed — Retail (2005): the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the original denial. Counsel only made general assertions on the appeal form, did not submit a promised brief or additional evidence, and therefore did not meet the burden of proof required for the appeal.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF