L-1A Dismissed — Retail: the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify an

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or a statement of fact in the director's original decision, as required by regulation. The AAO found that the appeal brief largely repeated information already in the record and improperly introduced new, unsupported facts and evidence of changes made after the petition was filed.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF