L-1A Dismissed — Textile Manufacturing (2019): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to prove that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily executive capacity. The AAO found the petitioner's evidence regarding its staffing levels to be insufficient and riddled with inconsistencies, such as discrepancies in employee counts, organizational charts, and wage documents. This lack of credible evidence failed to demonstrate that there were enough subordinate employees to relieve the beneficiary from performing day-to-day operational tasks.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF