L-1A Dismissed — Travel Services (2017): did not establish the beneficiary would be employed

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary would be employed primarily in an executive capacity. The Director and the AAO found that given the company's limited staffing and scope of operations, the beneficiary would likely be performing the day-to-day operational tasks of the business rather than primarily directing the organization or its major functions.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF