L-1A Dismissed — Travel Services: did not establish the beneficiary would be employed in a

Decision Summary

The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity, instead appearing to be involved in day-to-day sales duties. Additionally, the petitioner did not meet the evidentiary requirements for a 'new office' extension, failing to prove the U.S. company was operational, staffed, or financially viable. The appeal was also summarily dismissed for failing to identify a specific error in the original decision.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF