Dismissed
L-1A
L-1A Dismissed — Travel Services: did not meet any specific erroneous conclusion of law or
Decision Summary
The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner failed to identify any specific erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the director's decision. On the merits, the petitioner failed to meet the strict evidentiary requirements for a new office extension, conceding that the U.S. entity had not been doing business, was not staffed, and could not provide evidence of its financial status.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Or Executive Capacity New Office Extension Requirements Doing Business For One Year Staffing Of New Office Financial Status Of U.S. Company
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →