L-1A Dismissed — Used Clothing Export (2005): the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify an

Decision Summary

The appeal was summarily dismissed because the petitioner's counsel failed to specifically identify an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the initial denial, as required by regulations. The AAO concurred with the director's finding that the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a primarily managerial or executive capacity, correctly applying the standards for a new office extension.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF