Remanded
L-1A
L-1A Remanded โ E-Commerce (2019): the Director's decision was withdrawn because it improperly
Decision Summary
The Director's decision was withdrawn because it improperly focused on personnel management instead of the petitioner's claim of function management, which the AAO found was established. However, the case was remanded to address inconsistencies in the record regarding the beneficiary's employment dates and to determine if the beneficiary met the one-year continuous employment abroad requirement after accounting for time spent in the United States.
Criteria Discussed
Managerial Capacity Function Manager One Continuous Year Of Employment Abroad
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ