Remanded
L-1A
L-1A Remanded โ Education Services (2024): the Director incorrectly concluded that the beneficiary's
Decision Summary
The appeal was remanded because the Director incorrectly concluded that the beneficiary's time in the United States interrupted the required one year of continuous employment abroad. The AAO withdrew the Director's decision, finding the U.S. stay occurred after the qualifying one-year period, and sent the case back for a new decision to properly re-evaluate evidence of the foreign employment and the beneficiary's claimed executive capacity.
Criteria Discussed
One Year Of Continuous Employment Abroad Employment In An Executive Capacity
๐ Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions โ