L-1A Remanded — Heating Appliances (2018): the decision was remanded because the Director applied the

Decision Summary

The decision was remanded because the Director applied the incorrect legal standard, evaluating the case as an initial 'new office' petition rather than a new office extension. Additionally, the AAO found the record insufficient to demonstrate the beneficiary would be employed in an executive capacity, citing a repetitive and vague job description and inconsistent evidence regarding the company's staffing.

Criteria Discussed

Sign up free to download the original PDF