Remanded L-1A

L-1A Remanded โ€” Restaurant: the director denied the L-1A extension, concluding that a

๐Ÿ“… Date unknown ๐Ÿ‘ค Company ๐Ÿ“‚ Restaurant

Decision Summary

The director denied the L-1A extension, concluding that a franchise agreement meant the U.S. franchisor, not the foreign parent company, controlled the U.S. business, thus breaking the required qualifying relationship. The AAO remanded the case for a new decision, finding that the issue of whether the franchise agreement's terms negate the petitioner's control and the parent-subsidiary relationship required further consideration.

Criteria Discussed

Qualifying Relationship Parent-Subsidiary Control New Office Extension
๐Ÿ“„ Original decision (USCIS PDF)

Sign up free to download the original PDF

Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft

Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.

Browse Decisions โ†’