Sustained
L-1A
L-1A Sustained — Distribution (2017): the Director erred by not considering the intermittent
Decision Summary
The appeal was sustained because the Director erred by not considering the intermittent nature of the Beneficiary's proposed employment in the U.S. The AAO found that the petitioner successfully argued that its sole U.S. employee, outsourced companies, and foreign parent company staff provided sufficient support for day-to-day operations, allowing the Beneficiary to perform primarily executive duties during his visits.
Criteria Discussed
Executive Capacity Staffing Levels Reasonable Needs Of The Organization Intermittent Employment
📄 Original decision (USCIS PDF)
Sign up free to download the original PDF
Downloaded the case? Use it in your next draft →Research more L-1A decisions on MeritDraft
Browse AAO decisions by visa type, outcome, and criteria discussed.
Browse Decisions →